The Basic Method

Code:

## References1

1. Thomas S. Kuhn, *The Structure of Scientific Revolutions*, University of Chicago Press, 1962.  
2. Merton, R.K. “Puritanism, Pietism and Science.” *Sociological Review*, 1936.
3. Web source: [Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy – Scientific Revolution](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-revolution/)

Preview:

References

1. Thomas S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, 1962.
2. Merton, R.K. “Puritanism, Pietism and Science.” Sociological Review, 1936.
3. Web source: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy – Scientific Revolution

Reference Annotation Syntax

Code:

According to Merton's analysis[^1], the Puritan ethic played a key role...

[^1]: Merton, R.K. “Puritanism, Pietism and Science.” *Sociological Review*, 1936.

Preview:

According to Merton’s analysis¹, the Puritan ethic played a key role…

If you are using Hugo

Code:

The Puritan view of labor as a moral duty strongly influenced the rise of experimental science[^merton].

[^merton]: Merton, R.K. “Puritanism, Pietism and Science.” *Sociological Review*, 1936.

Preview:

The Puritan view of labor as a moral duty strongly influenced the rise of experimental science².

---

© 2025 Your Name. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Footnotes

1. Merton, R.K. “Puritanism, Pietism and Science.” Sociological Review, 1936. ↩

2. Merton, R.K. “Puritanism, Pietism and Science.” Sociological Review, 1936. ↩